New York Times – Artificial Intelligence : This Thriller Writer Took on a Tech Giant. And Won.

Oct 3, 2025

—

Source URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/03/books/review/andrea-bartz-anthropic-lawsuit.html
Source: New York Times – Artificial Intelligence
Title: This Thriller Writer Took on a Tech Giant. And Won.

Feedly Summary: Andrea Bartz was disturbed to learn that her books had been used to train A.I. chatbots. So she sued, and helped win the largest copyright settlement in history.

AI Summary and Description: Yes

Summary: The text discusses the legal battle initiated by author Andrea Bartz regarding the unauthorized use of her literary works to train AI chatbots. This case highlights significant implications for copyright issues in the realm of artificial intelligence, especially in relation to training datasets used by AI systems.

Detailed Description: The incident involving Andrea Bartz is a notable example of the intersection between copyright law and AI. Here are the key points of this case:

– **Unauthorized Use of Intellectual Property**: Bartz discovered that her books were utilized without consent as part of the training data for AI chatbots, raising serious questions about intellectual property rights in the digital age.

– **Legal Action and Copyright Settlement**: Bartz’s decision to sue over the unauthorized use culminated in the largest copyright settlement to date, establishing a legal precedent for similar cases in the future.

– **Impact on AI Development**: This case underscores the critical importance of ensuring compliance with copyright laws when developing and training AI systems, particularly generative models that rely extensively on large datasets derived from various sources.

– **Broader Implications for Authors and Creators**: The outcome of this case may encourage more authors and rights holders to pursue legal action against companies that exploit their works without permission, possibly reshaping the landscape of content creation in relation to AI technologies.

Overall, the implications for professionals in AI, cloud computing, and information security are profound, as the case underscores the necessity for robust governance frameworks that respect intellectual property rights while balancing the innovative capabilities of AI systems.

1 10 2 2025 3 5 a Act age AI AI development AI systems AI technologies All and Anthropic API art artificial Artificial Intelligence as at ated authors AWS Bi book bot bots by C capabilities chat Chatbot Chatbots CI CIA Cloud cloud computing co companies compliance Computing Consent content content creation copyright copyright issues Copyright Law copyright laws copyright settlement core creation critical D data dataset datasets de decision development digital digital age e exp exploit for framework frameworks future g Gen generative generative model Generative Models git Go governance governance framework governance frameworks H high Highlight HR http HTTPS impact implications in incident information information security Intel intellectual Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Rights intelligence inter io issue ite k Key l land large large datasets law lawsuit led Legal legal action legal battle legal precedent Li Lite lm M Mila mission ML Mode model models N new New York no o of on ons OPM ory oS oss out outcome over per point pre pro professionals property Property Rights ps Py Q question R rag raising RCE re real red review right Ro s sec security settlement SHA Sig Sim source SSE system systems T tech technologies ted text the Time times to Tor TP training training data training datasets UI UN under US use uth V Wi x york yt z