Source URL: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2025/10/daniel-miessler-on-the-ai-attack-defense-balance.html
Source: Schneier on Security
Title: Daniel Miessler on the AI Attack/Defense Balance
Feedly Summary: His conclusion:
Context wins
Basically whoever can see the most about the target, and can hold that picture in their mind the best, will be best at finding the vulnerabilities the fastest and taking advantage of them. Or, as the defender, applying patches or mitigations the fastest.
And if you’re on the inside you know what the applications do. You know what’s important and what isn’t. And you can use all that internal knowledge to fix things—hopefully before the baddies take advantage.
Summary and prediction
Attackers will have the advantage for 3-5 years. For less-advanced defender teams, this will take much longer.
…
AI Summary and Description: Yes
Summary: The text discusses the evolving dynamics between attackers and defenders in the cybersecurity landscape, emphasizing the role of internal knowledge and context in vulnerability assessment and response strategies. It predicts that attackers will have the upper hand for the next few years, while AI will eventually bolster defensive capabilities.
Detailed Description:
– The text underscores the importance of context in identifying security vulnerabilities and patching them effectively.
– It highlights that individuals with deep internal knowledge of an organization’s applications are better positioned to mitigate risks promptly.
– A prediction is made regarding the advantage of attackers over defenders in the short-term (3-5 years) due to the current state of AI and LLM (Large Language Model) technology.
– The author posits that while attackers can leverage open-source intelligence (OSINT) and reconnaissance methods to enhance their attack strategies, AI-driven tools will eventually provide defenders with critical contextual insights to improve their responses.
Key Points:
– Context is crucial for vulnerability identification and mitigation.
– Internal knowledge enables faster and more effective defensive measures.
– Predicts an asymmetric advantage favoring attackers for the next few years.
– Anticipates that advancements in AI (specifically AI and SPQA) will eventually shift the advantage to defenders.
– Highlights the current ineffectiveness of LLM technology in comprehensively managing organizational context.
– Emphasizes the need for defenders to evolve their capabilities as threats become more sophisticated.
The discussion is highly relevant for security professionals, especially those involved in AI security and infrastructure, as it outlines both strategic implications and a timeline for evolving defenses against increasingly adept cyber threats.