Source URL: https://blog.talosintelligence.com/maturing-the-cyber-threat-intelligence-program/
Source: Cisco Talos Blog
Title: Maturing the cyber threat intelligence program
Feedly Summary: The Cyber Threat Intelligence Capability Maturity Model (CTI-CMM) helps organizations assess and improve their threat intelligence programs by outlining 11 key areas and specific missions where CTI can support decision-making.
AI Summary and Description: Yes
**Summary:** The Cyber Threat Intelligence Capability Maturity Model (CTI-CMM) offers a structured framework to help organizations enhance their threat intelligence programs through a comprehensive assessment of 11 key areas. It defines four maturity levels ranging from foundational to leading, facilitating continuous improvement and strategic decision-making in cybersecurity.
**Detailed Description:**
The Cyber Threat Intelligence Capability Maturity Model (CTI-CMM) is a vital framework designed for organizations to evaluate and advance their cyber threat intelligence (CTI) initiatives. Key points include:
– **Purpose and Framework:**
– Provides a structured assessment of existing CTI capabilities.
– Outlines 11 specific domains where CTI can enhance decision-making processes.
– Encourages continuous improvement through a repeatable cycle model reminiscent of the “plan, do, check, act” management paradigm.
– **Maturity Levels:**
– **CTI0 (Pre-Foundational):** No executed practices exist.
– **CTI1 (Foundational):** Ad hoc practices focused on reactive actions.
– **CTI2 (Advanced):** Planned activities with documented practices and metrics aimed at proactive threat intelligence.
– **CTI3 (Leading):** Highly refined practices integrating prescriptive intelligence aligned with business objectives.
– **Domains of Improvement:**
– **Asset, Change, and Configuration Management:** Enhance asset management and risk detection.
– **Threat and Vulnerability Management:** Improve identification and mitigation of cybersecurity threats.
– **Risk Management:** Boost decision-making related to cyber risk.
– **Identity and Access Management:** Enhance management of identities and access controls.
– **Situational Awareness:** Develop better understanding and response to threat landscapes.
– **Event and Incident Response:** Strengthen responses to cybersecurity incidents.
– **Third-Party Risk Management:** Manage risks associated with suppliers.
– **Fraud and Abuse Management:** Protect against malicious attacks.
– **Workforce Management:** Cultivate a strong cybersecurity culture.
– **Cybersecurity Architecture:** Maintain and enhance cybersecurity structures.
– **Cybersecurity Program Management:** Offer strategic governance for overall cybersecurity endeavors.
– **Practical Implications:**
– Organizations should focus on developing CTI programs that are pragmatic and tailored to their unique environment and resource capabilities, rather than striving merely for high maturity scores.
– Acknowledges that elevating maturity levels may require allocation of resources effectively to meet actual user needs.
– **Historical Context:**
– The model builds on previous capability maturity efforts, notably the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) and inputs from the Cybersecurity Capability Maturity Model (C2M2).
The CTI-CMM serves as a crucial tool for organizations to refine their cybersecurity strategies through a more structured and measurable approach, making it particularly insightful for security and compliance professionals looking to enhance their threat intelligence capabilities. As the cyber threat landscape evolves, leveraging the CTI-CMM can promote robust organizational responses and resilience against emerging threats.