The Register: Top AI models – even American ones – parrot Chinese propaganda, report finds

Jun 26, 2025

—

Source URL: https://www.theregister.com/2025/06/26/top_ai_models_parrot_chinese/
Source: The Register
Title: Top AI models – even American ones – parrot Chinese propaganda, report finds

Feedly Summary: Communist Party tracts in, Communist Party opinions out
Five popular AI models all show signs of bias toward viewpoints promoted by the Chinese Communist Party, and censor material it finds distasteful, according to a new report.…

AI Summary and Description: Yes

Summary: The text discusses biases in AI models that reportedly favor the Chinese Communist Party’s viewpoints, highlighting issues of censorship. This is significant for professionals in AI security and information security, as it raises concerns about fairness, accountability, and regulatory compliance in AI systems.

Detailed Description: The content reveals critical findings from a report indicating that several popular AI models demonstrate a tendency to align with ideologies and opinions endorsed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), while simultaneously censoring opposing perspectives. This situation poses substantial implications regarding the integrity and transparency of AI technologies used in practice. Key points include:

– **Bias in AI Models**: The findings illustrate that AI models are not neutral; instead, they can inadvertently carry the biases of their underlying training data, which in this case, aligns closely with a specific political ideology.

– **Censorship Issues**: The report indicates that these models actively suppress material that conflicts with CCP views, raising concerns about the implications for free speech and the freedom of information.

– **Impact on AI Ethics**: This situation highlights ongoing ethical dilemmas in AI development, affirming the need for a robust framework around AI fairness and bias mitigation.

– **Relevance to Compliance and Governance**: Organizations leveraging AI technologies must consider the compliance implications of biased outputs, particularly those that may conflict with regulatory standards regarding fairness and equality.

– **Security Considerations**: For security professionals, this bias poses risks related to misinformation and trust, emphasizing the need for rigorous security assessments surrounding AI systems.

These findings encourage a critical review of AI governance frameworks and policies to ensure that AI technologies support a diverse set of viewpoints and maintain ethical standards in application.

2 2025 5 a account accountability Act AGI AI AI development AI Ethics AI governance ai model AI models AI security AI systems AI technologies air American and anti app Application art as assessment assessments ated Bi bias bias mitigation biased output biased outputs biases by C censorship censorship issues CERN Chinese Chinese Communist Party CI co compliance compliance and governance compliance implications concerns content critical D data de demo development e end EoL ethical ethical dilemmas ethical standards Ethics EU fairness for framework frameworks free free speech g GIS Go governance governance framework governance frameworks gs H high Highlight http HTTPS implications in information information security integrity io issue k Key l led Li M misinformation mitigation Mode model models N neutral new NGO NIST no o of on one OPM organization organizations ory oS out output Outputs over party point policies pre pro professionals propaganda ps Q quality R rag Raise raising rate RCE regulatory regulatory compliance report review Risk risks Ro RoT Rust s sec security security assessment security assessments security considerations security professionals side Sig Sim source specific Speech SSE standards support system systems T tech technologies ted text the to Tor TP training training data transparency trust under up US use V Wi x z