Slashdot: Chinese Hacked US Telecom a Year Before Known Wireless Breaches

Jun 5, 2025

—

Source URL: https://it.slashdot.org/story/25/06/05/0023243/chinese-hacked-us-telecom-a-year-before-known-wireless-breaches?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
Source: Slashdot
Title: Chinese Hacked US Telecom a Year Before Known Wireless Breaches

Feedly Summary:

AI Summary and Description: Yes

Summary: The reported intrusion of Chinese hackers into an American telecommunications company in 2023 raises significant concerns about the vulnerabilities in U.S. communications infrastructure. Evidence suggests state-sponsored cyber activity has been ongoing for years, highlighting the need for enhanced cybersecurity measures and government oversight in telecommunications.

Detailed Description: The article discusses a significant cybersecurity incident involving Chinese hackers who infiltrated an American telecommunications firm, revealing critical insights for security and compliance professionals:

– **Timeline and Discovery**: Cyber investigators discovered that malware from Chinese state-backed hacking groups was active on the company’s systems for seven months, beginning in the summer of 2023.

– **Detection and Reporting**: This breach was not publicly acknowledged until January 2024, illustrating the delayed reporting of significant cyber incidents, which can hinder timely responses and fortify defenses.

– **Specific Malware Used**: The malware identified, known as Demodex, is linked to China’s Ministry of State Security. This sophisticated rootkit malware provides extensive access to systems, enabling prolonged undetected presence, a feature that underscores the importance of advanced detection techniques.

– **Connectivity to Broader Espionage**: The incident is indicative of larger cybersecurity threats, potentially similar to past incursions linked to a Chinese hacking group called Salt Typhoon. This connection underscores the need for organizations to remain vigilant against state-sponsored cyber threats.

– **Expert Commentary**: Cybersecurity expert Marc Rogers emphasizes long-known vulnerabilities in critical infrastructure, suggesting this attack is part of a broader trend that demands immediate attention from policymakers and industry leaders.

– **Government and International Dynamics**: A Chinese government spokesperson’s denial of responsibility reflects the ongoing geopolitical tensions and the complexity of attributing cyberattacks, which complicates response strategies for affected nations.

Implications for Security and Compliance Professionals:
– **Critical Infrastructure Protection**: This breach exemplifies the pressing need for robust cybersecurity postures within communications and other critical infrastructure sectors. Organizations must enhance their defenses and detection capabilities to guard against advanced persistent threats.

– **Regulatory Considerations**: Increased government scrutiny and potential regulatory changes may arise in response to such breaches. Organizations need to prepare for compliance with evolving cybersecurity regulations and standards.

– **International Collaboration**: Effective response to cyber threats often requires international cooperation and intelligence sharing to identify and mitigate threats from state-sponsored actors.

This incident not only highlights the ongoing risks posed by state-sponsored cyberactivities but also serves as a crucial reminder of the importance of proactive security measures in safeguarding critical infrastructure.

1 2 2024 24 3 4 5 a access Act advanced advanced detection advanced detection techniques advanced persistent threat advanced persistent threats AI alt American and art as attack attacks backed hacking Bi breach breaches by C capabilities CERN China Chinese Chinese government Chinese hacker Chinese hackers Chinese hacking Chinese hacking group CI CIA co Col collaboration communication Communications. complexity compliance compliance professionals concerns connectivity cooperation core critical critical infrastructure critical infrastructure protection cyber cyber incident cyber incidents cyber threat cyber threats cyberattack Cyberattacks cybersecurit Cybersecurity cybersecurity expert cybersecurity incident cybersecurity measures cybersecurity posture cybersecurity regulations cybersecurity threat cybersecurity threats D de defense defenses demand demo denial detection detection capabilities detection techniques DoT e edge effective end espionage exp expert feature for g Gen geo geopolitical geopolitical tensions Go government government oversight government scrutiny Group H hack hacker hackers hacking hacking group hacking groups high Highlight HR http HTTPS implications implications for security in incident industry industry leaders infrastructure infrastructure protection infrastructure sector insights Intel intelligence intelligence sharing inter intern international collaboration international cooperation io J k knowledge known vulnerabilities l Labor large led Li Link linked long M makers malware man measures media Mila mini Mode N nation NGO NIST no non o of on only operation organization organizations ory oS other out over oversight phi policy policymakers porting post potential pre proactive proactive security proactive security measures professionals protection public Q R Raise rate RCE red Regulation regulations regulatory regulatory change regulatory changes regulatory considerations report reporting response response strategies responses responsibility Risk risks Ro Root rootkit RoT s safe Salt Typhoon sec sector security security and compliance Security Expert security incident security measure security measures security posture security postures security threat security threats SHA sharing side Sig Sim size source specific sponsored sponsored actors sponsored cyber activity sponsored cyber threats SSE standards state state-sponsored state-sponsored actors state-sponsored cyber threats STIG strategies system systems T tech techniques telecom telecommunications the threat threats Time to Tor TP U.S. UI under up ups US use V vulnerabilities Ware Wi x