Scott Logic: Read the books! Should junior developers use LLMs?

Source URL: https://blog.scottlogic.com/2025/05/27/read-the-books-should-junior-developers-use-llms.html
Source: Scott Logic
Title: Read the books! Should junior developers use LLMs?

Feedly Summary: Large Language Models are powerful tools that can greatly enhance software developers’ productivity, but for junior developers starting a career in tech, they may hinder long-term growth by abstracting away essential programming fundamentals.

AI Summary and Description: Yes

**Summary:**
The text explores the journey of a new software developer who relies on Large Language Models (LLMs) like ChatGPT for coding assistance. While acknowledging the efficiency gained from such tools, the author warns against over-reliance that can impede fundamental learning. The text highlights a delicate balance between embracing AI tools and ensuring foundational understanding in programming, emphasizing the need for junior developers to use LLMs judiciously.

**Detailed Description:**
The author, a novice in software development, reflects on the impact of LLMs on their learning experience. Here are some critical points discussed in the text:

– **Timing of Career Entry:** The author started their career shortly after the release of ChatGPT, indicating an early exposure to AI assistance in programming.

– **Initial Dependence on LLMs:**
– LLMs appeared to provide immediate coding support, helping in understanding programming at a basic level.
– However, this reliance masked the deeper learning process necessary for mastering coding fundamentals and logic.

– **Challenges in Learning Coding:**
– The author describes the steep learning curve associated with learning to code, where understanding complex concepts is essential.
– They highlight that LLMs can obscure the learning journey, leading to superficial understanding rather than in-depth mastery of the skills.

– **The Metaphor of “The Incredible Book Eating Boy”:**
– The reference illustrates the consequence of skipping fundamental learning, akin to consuming knowledge without digesting it.

– **Potential Risks of Overreliance on LLMs:**
– Overusing AI tools fosters a lack of context, reducing problem-solving abilities.
– The author compares relying on LLMs to outsourcing critical educational moments, which could lead to gaps in understanding when independently tackling coding challenges.

– **Essential Skills for Developers:**
– Searching for information: Importance of sifting through resources, increasing development knowledge.
– Debugging: Critical thinking and problem-solving skills, rather than seeking direct answers from AI.
– Code Review: Understanding peer code to enhance personal skill sets and contribute to collective knowledge.

– **Embracing AI in a Balanced Manner:**
– The author proposes using AI tools judiciously, not as a crutch but as an aid for particular tasks, such as:
– Quick syntax lookups.
– Rubber Duck debugging to clarify thought processes.
– Assisting in code refactoring upon gaining a foundational comprehension.

– **Conclusion:**
– The text argues that while AI can enhance productivity and assist experienced developers, it can undermine foundational skills of junior developers. Mastery of programming basics should take precedence, with AI seen as a supplement rather than a replacement for human learning and growth.

This analysis underscores the significance of maintaining a balance between leveraging AI capabilities and cultivating essential programming skills, a vital insight for professionals in software development and AI-related fields.