Source URL: https://simonwillison.net/2025/Aug/4/himbodhisattva/#atom-everything
Source: Simon Willison’s Weblog
Title: Quoting @himbodhisattva
Feedly Summary: for services that wrap GPT-3, is it possible to do the equivalent of sql injection? like, a prompt-injection attack? make it think it’s completed the task and then get access to the generation, and ask it to repeat the original instruction?
— @himbodhisattva, coining the term prompt injection on 13th May 2022, four months before I did
Tags: prompt-injection, security, generative-ai, ai, llms
AI Summary and Description: Yes
Summary: The text discusses the potential for prompt injection attacks on GPT-3, mirroring SQL injection vulnerabilities found in traditional databases. This insight is crucial for professionals in AI security, particularly within the generative AI domain, highlighting the need for robust defensive measures.
Detailed Description: The text brings forth the concept of “prompt injection,” a security vulnerability that emerges within AI models like GPT-3. This attack vector can potentially manipulate AI responses by embedding malicious instructions within prompts, similar to how SQL injection manipulates database queries. Below are the major points discussed:
– **Prompt Injection Concept**:
– Prompt injection can compromise the integrity of AI models by tricking them into executing unintended commands or returning sensitive information.
– The attack leverages the open-ended nature of AI prompts, allowing malicious users to craft inputs designed to extract details or alter the model’s behavior.
– **Comparison to SQL Injection**:
– Just as SQL injection exploits the vulnerabilities of SQL databases to manipulate data retrieval, prompt injection aims to exploit AI models by injecting harmful commands, creating the potential for unauthorized access to specific functionalities of the AI.
– **Significance for AI Security**:
– Understanding these vulnerabilities is imperative for developers and security professionals working with generative AI models.
– The text suggests a growing need for security frameworks and practices specifically catered to the nuances of AI interactions.
– **Implications for Infrastructure Security**:
– Organizations integrating AI must establish proactive measures to ensure that their AI systems are robust against prompt injection attempts.
– Security controls must evolve to account for these types of AI-specific attack vectors, encompassing new guidelines and policies in security protocols.
Overall, the sentiment expressed in the text and the coining of “prompt injection” point to the rising importance of securing AI technologies from emerging threats that traditional security measures may not adequately address.