Microsoft Security Blog: Frozen in transit: Secret Blizzard’s AiTM campaign against diplomats

Source URL: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/security/blog/2025/07/31/frozen-in-transit-secret-blizzards-aitm-campaign-against-diplomats/
Source: Microsoft Security Blog
Title: Frozen in transit: Secret Blizzard’s AiTM campaign against diplomats

Feedly Summary: Microsoft Threat Intelligence has uncovered a cyberespionage campaign by the Russian state actor we track as Secret Blizzard that has been ongoing since at least 2024, targeting embassies in Moscow using an adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) position to deploy their custom ApolloShadow malware.
The post Frozen in transit: Secret Blizzard’s AiTM campaign against diplomats appeared first on Microsoft Security Blog.

AI Summary and Description: Yes

**Summary:** Microsoft Threat Intelligence has disclosed a cyberespionage campaign orchestrated by the Russian state actor known as Secret Blizzard, targeting embassies in Moscow with a sophisticated adversary-in-the-middle (AiTM) technique. This campaign utilizes a malware called ApolloShadow to install malicious root certificates and collect intelligence from diplomatic devices. The report serves as a significant alert for security professionals, emphasizing the need for enhanced protective measures against advanced persistent threats, particularly for organizations operating in high-risk geopolitical environments.

**Detailed Description:**
The text provides an in-depth analysis of Secret Blizzard’s cyberespionage activities, specifically targeting diplomatic entities in Moscow. The campaign leverages advanced malware and tactics to compromise systems, highlighting critical vulnerabilities in network infrastructure and the necessity for robust security protocols. Major points include:

– **Adversary Description:**
– Secret Blizzard is attributed to the Russian Federal Security Service (Center 16), known for their covert cyber operations against both foreign and domestic entities.
– The use of AiTM techniques suggests a high level of sophistication, enabling persistent access to sensitive communications.

– **Malware Insights:**
– **ApolloShadow**: This malware can install trusted root certificates, allowing for interception and manipulation of secure communications, effectively stripping away TLS/SSL protections.
– The campaign exploits captive portals commonly used in ISPs and telecommunications services to redirect users into downloading compromised software.

– **Initial Access and Delivery:**
– Successful infiltration begins with redirecting users through a captive portal, tricking them into executing ApolloShadow.
– The malware’s landing page appears legitimate, often masquerading as a Kaspersky installer, leading to significant trust exploitation.

– **Defensive Recommendations:**
– Organizations are advised to enhance their network security by:
– Routing all traffic through encrypting tunnels or using trusted VPN services.
– Implementing least privilege access models and multi-factor authentication (MFA) for critical accounts.
– Regularly reviewing admin-level accounts to ensure no unauthorized access has been granted.

– **Detection and Mitigation:**
– Suggestions include enabling cloud-delivered security features for rapid response and using endpoint detection and response (EDR) solutions in block mode to curb potential threats.
– The importance of threat intelligence and proactive monitoring is emphasized, urging organizations to adopt tools like Microsoft Security Copilot for incident response and investigations.

– **Indicators of Compromise (IOCs):**
– The document includes IOCs relevant to the threat actor, facilitating detection and response measures by IT security teams.

This detailed exploration into the tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) of Secret Blizzard emphasizes the complexity of modern cyber threats and the critical need for comprehensive security strategies to safeguard sensitive diplomatic and government infrastructures. Security professionals must stay vigilant and continuously adapt to evolving threat landscapes, particularly in relation to state-sponsored cyber activities.