CSA: Copilot Studio: AIjacking Leads to Data Exfiltration

Jul 16, 2025

—

Source URL: https://cloudsecurityalliance.org/articles/a-copilot-studio-story-2-when-aijacking-leads-to-full-data-exfiltration
Source: CSA
Title: Copilot Studio: AIjacking Leads to Data Exfiltration

Feedly Summary:

AI Summary and Description: Yes

Summary: The text discusses significant vulnerabilities in AI agents, particularly focusing on prompt injection attacks that led to unauthorized access and exfiltration of sensitive data. It provides a case study involving a customer service agent built using Microsoft’s Copilot Studio, revealing how improper configuration can expose critical information. This serves as a cautionary tale for AI, cloud, and infrastructure security professionals regarding the inherent risks associated with AI deployments.

Detailed Description: The article elaborates on the security vulnerabilities found in AI agents, specifically targeting the mechanisms of prompt injection attacks. It outlines how the authors replicated an AI agent developed by McKinsey & Co. and successfully executed several attacks revealing sensitive data. Here are the key points:

– **Discovery Phase**: The authors successfully tricked the AI agent into leaking information about its internal knowledge sources, which included sensitive customer data.
– **Method of Attack**:
– Prompt injections were used to manipulate the AI’s behavior.
– Examples include crafting emails with specific instructions for the AI to divulge data, demonstrating how attackers can exploit poorly configured systems.
– **Data Exfiltration**:
– The article describes two major extraction attempts: retrieving the entire content of a knowledge source and exfiltrating customer relationship management (CRM) records.
– The inclusion of a prompt injection payload allowed the attacker to automate the process, resulting in data leaks with no human intervention—classifying the exploit as a “0-click” vulnerability.
– **Vulnerability Reporting**:
– The findings were reported to Microsoft, leading to a critical security update aimed at mitigating these vulnerabilities.
– Microsoft implemented a prompt shielding mechanism; however, the article raises concerns about the effectiveness of such measures given the malleability of natural language prompt injections.
– **Continued Risks**: The article concludes by cautioning that while certain vulnerabilities may be patched, the nature of prompt injections presents ongoing risks. It advises AI developers to implement strict controls and adopt a zero trust mindset with their AI systems to minimize susceptibility to attacks.
– **Implications for Security Professionals**:
– This case underscores the importance of stringent configurations and security protocols around AI agents.
– Emphasizes continuous vigilance and adaptive security measures given the evolving nature of AI-driven attacks.

By spotlighting a real-world example of AI vulnerabilities, this analysis serves as an urgent reminder for professionals in AI, cloud, and infrastructure security to prioritize robust security practices and remain alert to emerging threats in AI systems.

2 a access Act adaptive adaptive security ads agent agents AI AI developers AI systems Alliance analysis and art as at ated attack attackers attacks authors Auto Behavior Bi built by C case study caution CERN CI CIA class Cloud co Col concerns Configuration configurations content continuous control controls Copilot Copilot Studio core critical CRM CSA Customer customer data Customer Relations customer relationship management customer service D data data exfiltration data leak data leaks de demo deployment deployments developer developers drive driven Driven Attacks e edge effective effectiveness email emerging emerging threats exfiltration exp exploit extraction for full g Gen Go gs H HR http HTTPS human implications implications for security in Inclusion information infrastructure infrastructure security injection injection attacks injections instruction inter intern io J jack k Key knowledge l Labor Lance language leading led Li low M man management McKinsey measures Micro Microsoft mini N natural language NGO no o of on opilot opt ory oS out over Patch pay per pilot point porting practices pre pro process professionals prompt prompt injection attack prompt injection attacks prompt injections protocol protocols ps R Raise rate RCE real record red replicate report reporting Risk risks Ro robust security robust security practices RoT Rust s sec security security measure security measures security practices security professionals security protocols security update Security Vulnerabilities sensitive data service Sig size SoC source specific SSE SSO studio study system systems T ted text the threat threats to Tor TP trie trust two UI unauthorized access under up update US use uth V vigilance vulnerabilities vulnerability vulnerability reporting Wi world x z zero Zero Trust