New York Times – Artificial Intelligence : Scientist Use A.I. To Mimic the Mind, Warts and All

Jul 2, 2025

—

Source URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/02/science/ai-psychology-mind.html
Source: New York Times – Artificial Intelligence
Title: Scientist Use A.I. To Mimic the Mind, Warts and All

Feedly Summary: To better understand human cognition, scientists trained a large language model on 10 million psychology experiment questions. It now answers questions much like we do.

AI Summary and Description: Yes

Summary: The text is relevant as it discusses the training of a large language model (LLM) on psychology experiments to enhance its understanding of human cognition. This serves as a fascinating intersection between AI development and insights into cognitive processes, which could provide implications for advancements in AI security and applications.

Detailed Description:

– The growing domain of artificial intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), is increasingly intersecting with human cognitive science.
– A recent initiative involved training an LLM on 10 million questions derived from psychology experiments, aiming to replicate human-like responses and understanding.
– This development has several implications:
– **Enhanced User Experience:** Improved ability for AI to engage in human-like interactions, potentially benefiting applications in customer service, therapy chatbots, and educational tools.
– **AI Security Insights:** With a better understanding of human cognition, developers can devise AI systems that are not only more efficient but also more secure by simulating human decision-making in risk assessment and anomaly detection.
– **Ethical Considerations:** Understanding human cognition leads to potential ethical implications surrounding AI behavior, such as bias and decision-making transparency. This demands greater scrutiny and compliance with regulations.
– **Future Research Opportunities:** The intersection of psychology and AI may open new avenues for exploring cognitive limitations and biases, which can further inform the development of secure AI systems.

In essence, as experts in security and compliance analyze this information, the implications for training methodologies could lead to improved security frameworks, the establishment of governance standards surrounding AI interactions, and the need for thoughtful design in confirmation with privacy laws and ethical standards.

1 10 2 2025 5 7 a Act actions ads advancement advancements AI AI behavior AI development AI interactions AI security AI systems and anomaly detection app Application applications Arch art artificial Artificial Intelligence as assessment AWS Behavior Bi bias biases bots by C chat Chatbot Chatbots CI CIA co cognitive cognitive processes cognitive science compliance Customer customer service D de decision decision-making demand design detection developer developers development domain e education educational educational tools efficient ethical ethical considerations ethical implications ethical standards exp experience expert Experts for framework frameworks future future research g Gen Go governance governance standards H http HTTPS human human cognition implications in information insights Intel intelligence inter interaction interactions io k l language language model language models large large language model Large Language Model (LLM) large language models Large Language Models (LLMs) law led Li limitations llm llms lm M making man methodologies ML Mode model models N new New York no o of on only open OPM over potential privacy privacy law privacy laws pro process processes ps psychology Py Q question R RCE Regulation regulations replicate research research opportunities response responses Risk Risk Assessment Ro row s science scientists search sec secure security security and compliance security framework security frameworks service side Sig Sim source SSE standards system systems T text the therapy therapy chatbot therapy chatbots Thought Time times to tool tools TP trained training training method training methodologies transparency under US use user user experience V Wi x york yt z