Campus Technology: Cloud Security Alliance Offers Playbook for Red Teaming Agentic AI Systems

Jun 14, 2025

—

Source URL: https://campustechnology.com/articles/2025/06/13/cloud-security-alliance-offers-playbook-for-red-teaming-agentic-ai-systems.aspx?admgarea=topic.security
Source: Campus Technology
Title: Cloud Security Alliance Offers Playbook for Red Teaming Agentic AI Systems

Feedly Summary: Cloud Security Alliance Offers Playbook for Red Teaming Agentic AI Systems

AI Summary and Description: Yes

Summary: The Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) has released a guide tailored for red teaming Agentic AI systems, addressing the unique security vulnerabilities of autonomous AI. The guide emphasizes practical testing methods and outlines twelve distinct threat categories related to Agentic AI, highlighting the critical need for continuous security assessments.

Detailed Description: The newly introduced “Red Teaming Testing Guide for Agentic AI Systems” by the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA) tackles the pressing security issues posed by the rise of Agentic AI—AI systems that have capabilities to autonomously plan, reason, and operate in both real and virtual environments. Unlike traditional generative models, these advanced systems introduce complex attack surfaces that necessitate rigorous testing and evaluation.

Key points from the CSA’s guide include:

– **Focus on Agentic AI**:
– Agentic AI can function independently, making it essential to simulate adversarial threats for safety and resilience.
– The guide extends applications of existing frameworks such as MAESTRO and OWASP’s AI Exchange into a red teaming context.

– **Twelve High-Risk Threat Categories**:
– The document outlines twelve distinct threat categories specifically associated with Agentic AI, including:
– **Authorization & Control Hijacking**: Targeting vulnerabilities between permissioning layers and autonomous actions.
– **Checker-out-of-the-loop**: Avoiding safety mechanisms or human involvement during critical tasks.
– **Goal Manipulation**: Adversarial inputs that skew agent objectives.
– **Knowledge Base Poisoning**: Damaging long-term data integrity.
– **Multi-agent Exploitation**: Engaging multiple AI agents in collusive or deceptive behaviors.
– **Untraceability**: Concealing the origins of actions to evade oversight.

– **Testing Methodology and Tools**:
– Each threat category is accompanied by defined test setups, objectives for red teams, evaluation metrics, and strategies for mitigation.
– Recommended tools include MAESTRO, Promptfoo’s LLM Security DB, and newer systems such as Salesforce’s FuzzAI and Microsoft Foundry’s testing agents.

– **Shift to Continuous Testing**:
– The CSA advocates for a shift from static threat modeling to an ongoing validation approach involving simulation-based testing and comprehensive assessments throughout the AI development lifecycle.
– This is particularly crucial for systems operating in sensitive domains like finance, healthcare, and industrial automation, where autonomous decision-making can have far-reaching implications.

Overall, the CSA’s red teaming guide for Agentic AI systems serves as a critical resource for security professionals, emphasizing the importance of incorporating rigorous testing practices into the development lifecycle of modern autonomous systems. By highlighting operational threats and offering actionable testing frameworks, the guide enhances the security posture necessary to mitigate potential risks associated with Agentic AI.

1 2 2025 3 5 a Act actions advanced adversarial adversarial inputs agent agentic AI Agentic AI systems agents AGI AI AI development AI systems Alliance alt and app Application applications Aria art as assessment assessments attack attack surface attack surfaces authorization Auto automation autonomous autonomous decision autonomous systems based based testing Behavior Bi by C capabilities CI CIA Cloud cloud security Cloud Security Alliance co Col Context continuous security assessments continuous testing control critical critical tasks D data data integrity de deceptive behavior decision decision-making DeFi development development lifecycle document domain domains e edge end environment evaluation Evaluation Metrics exp exploit Exploitation face finance fine for Foundry framework frameworks function g Gen generative generative model Generative Models Go goal H health Healthcare high Highlight hijacking HR http HTTPS human human involvement implications in industrial automation integrity io Iron issue J jack k Key knowledge knowledge base l led Li life llm lm long loop M making man manipulation metrics Micro Microsoft mission mitigation Mode model modeling models Modern multi N new NGO no NPU o of off on operation OPM ory oS out over oversight OWASP play playbook point post potential potential risks practices pre professionals prompt ps Q R rate RCE real red red team red teaming Red Teams release Resil resilience resource Rigorous Testing Risk risks Ro RSA s safe safety safety mechanisms sales Salesforce sec security security assessment security assessments security issues security posture security professionals Security Vulnerabilities shift Sig Sim simulation size SoC source specific SSE SSO strategies system systems T Task tasks team teaming Teams tech technology ted test Testing Testing agents testing framework testing frameworks testing methodology testing methods testing practices text the threat threat categories threat model Threat Modeling threats to tool tools TP traceability trial UI up ups US uth V val Valid Validation validation approach Valuation virtual virtual environment virtual environments vulnerabilities Wi x