Google Online Security Blog: Mitigating prompt injection attacks with a layered defense strategy

Jun 13, 2025

—

Source URL: http://security.googleblog.com/2025/06/mitigating-prompt-injection-attacks.html
Source: Google Online Security Blog
Title: Mitigating prompt injection attacks with a layered defense strategy

Feedly Summary:

AI Summary and Description: Yes

**Summary:**
The text discusses emerging security threats associated with generative AI, particularly focusing on indirect prompt injections that manipulate AI systems through hidden malicious instructions. Google outlines its layered security strategy to address these threats within its Gemini platform by using advanced mitigation techniques, including content classifiers, user confirmation systems, and ongoing collaborations with AI security researchers. This comprehensive approach is pivotal for professionals in AI and cloud security, emphasizing the importance of proactive security measures in evolving AI landscapes.

**Detailed Description:**
The text presents a thorough examination of the security challenges posed by generative AI, particularly through the lens of indirect prompt injections. It details how such vulnerabilities can arise from benign-looking external data like emails or documents, which can contain harmful instructions that manipulate AI responses.

– **Emerging Security Threats:**
– **Indirect Prompt Injections:** A new attack vector where malicious commands are embedded in external data, unlike direct injections which involve inputting commands directly into a prompt.
– The risk is increasing as generative AI sees wider adoption across various sectors.

– **Google’s Security Measures:**
– **Defense-in-Depth Strategy:** Utilizes multiple layers of security throughout various stages of the prompt lifecycle in Gemini.
– Enhancements made to protect against indirect prompt injections as part of AI security best practices include:
– **Prompt Injection Content Classifiers:** These classifiers leverage AI research to detect and filter malicious instructions, ensuring secure interactions within Google Workspace.
– **Security Thought Reinforcement:** Adds security-focused instructions to LLMs to help them ignore potential malicious inputs while performing user tasks.
– **Markdown Sanitization and Suspicious URL Redaction:** Prevents the execution of potentially harmful URLs encountered within user data.
– **User Confirmation Framework:** Enables explicit user confirmations for sensitive actions to mitigate risky operations.
– **End-User Security Mitigation Notifications:** Notifies users of security interventions taken by the system, fostering awareness and vigilance against similar threats.

– **Holistic Approach to Security:**
– Emphasizes the importance of continuous research, collaboration with industry experts, and community partnerships aimed at enhancing AI security measures.
– Utilizes rigorous testing methodologies including manual and automated red teaming.
– The commitment to active engagement with security vulnerabilities through responsible disclosure indicates a strong focus on building trust with users.

– **Future Directions:**
– Ongoing improvements to Gemini’s security features are planned, including the incorporation of further defenses against prompt injection attacks, which will be developed based on extensive research and collaboration.

This text serves as an essential reference for security and compliance professionals focusing on the rapidly evolving domain of AI security. It highlights not only current vulnerabilities but also proactive strategies employed by leading organizations like Google to safeguard AI implementations against sophisticated threats.

2 2025 5 a Act actions adoption advanced AI AI implementation AI landscape AI security AI systems and API app Arch ARM art as attack attack vector attacks Auto automated red aware awareness based Best best practices Bi building by C challenges CI CIA class classifiers Cloud cloud security co Col collaboration command commit community compliance compliance professionals content content classifiers cross Current D data de defense defense strategy defense-in-depth defenses depth depth strategy disclosure document domain e email emerging end engagement event execution exp expert Experts External feature features focused for framework future future directions g Gemini Gemini platform Gen generative Generative AI Go Google Google Workspace H harm high Highlight HR http implementation in indirect prompt injection indirect prompt injections industry industry experts injection injection attacks injections inter interaction interactions io J k l Labor land layered defense layered security leading led Li life llm llms lm M made malicious instructions man markdown measures methodologies Mila mini mitigation mitigation techniques ML multi N nation new NGO no notifications NPU o of on online security only operation operations opt organization organizations oS out partnership partnerships phi platform potential practices pre proactive proactive security proactive security measures professionals prompt prompt injection attack prompt injection attacks prompt injections prompt-injection ps Q R rag rate RCE red red team red teaming reinforcement research researchers response responses responsible responsible disclosure Rigorous Testing Risk RMF Ro RoT Rust s safe search sec sector secure security security and compliance security best practices security challenges security features security measure security measures Security Research Security Researcher security researchers security strategy security threat security threats Security Vulnerabilities Sim size SoC source SSE SSO strategies Strategy system systems T Tails Task tasks team teaming tech techniques ted test Testing testing methodologies text the Thought threat threats to Tor TP trust UI US use user user confirmation framework user data User Security Users V vents vigilance vulnerabilities Ware Wi x