Slashdot: News Orgs Say AI Firm Stole Articles, Spit Out ‘Hallucinations’

Source URL: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/25/02/13/2227239/news-orgs-say-ai-firm-stole-articles-spit-out-hallucinations?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanon&utm_medium=feed
Source: Slashdot
Title: News Orgs Say AI Firm Stole Articles, Spit Out ‘Hallucinations’

Feedly Summary:

AI Summary and Description: Yes

Summary: The text reports on a lawsuit filed by Conde Nast and several media companies against AI startup Cohere for alleged copyright and trademark infringement related to their published articles, raising key issues about intellectual property rights in AI training processes.

Detailed Description: The lawsuit highlights the growing tension between traditional media entities and artificial intelligence companies over the use of copyrighted materials. This case can significantly impact compliance and governance in the AI sector.

– **Parties Involved**: Conde Nast, which owns notable publications like Ars Technica, Wired, and The New Yorker, has led the legal charge alongside other prestigious media companies.
– **Allegations**: The complaint asserts that Cohere has used copyrighted articles without permission for training its large language model, thus creating potential competition in the AI market.
– **Claims**: The lawsuit claims that Cohere:
– Engaged in systematic copyright and trademark infringement.
– Produced fake articles attributed to these publishers, misinforming the public and damaging reputations.
– **Legal Request**: The plaintiffs seek considerable damages, including:
– Statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringed work.
– Actual damages, Cohere’s profits, and statutory damages for trademark infringement.
– **Specifics**: The suit identifies over 4,000 articles as infringed, hinting at a substantial impact on content creators.
– **Cohere’s Defense**: Cohere maintains that it adheres to responsible practices for training its AI and disputes the claims made, expressing willingness to engage with the publishers directly.

This lawsuit emphasizes the importance of securing intellectual property rights and compliance with copyright laws as the industry evolves. Security and compliance professionals in the AI and media fields must carefully monitor legal developments like this, as they could set critical precedents for future AI training practices and the handling of proprietary content.