Hacker News: Fruit of the Poisonous Llama?

Feb 11, 2025

—

Source URL: https://shkspr.mobi/blog/2023/07/fruit-of-the-poisonous-llama/
Source: Hacker News
Title: Fruit of the Poisonous Llama?

Feedly Summary: Comments

AI Summary and Description: Yes

Summary: The text discusses a lawsuit against vendors of Large Language Models (LLMs), focusing on allegations of copyright infringement due to unconsented use of copyrighted materials in training datasets. It highlights concerns regarding the legality of AI training practices and raises ethical questions related to the ownership of intellectual property.

Detailed Description: The content addresses significant legal and ethical issues surrounding the training of large language models (LLMs), specifically concerning the rights of authors whose works may have been used without consent. Here are the major points:

– **Lawsuit Against LLM Vendors**: A group of authors is suing various vendors of LLMs, claiming copyright infringement from the use of their works in training datasets.

– **Training Dataset Analysis**:
– **Meta’s LLaMA Paper**: It states that Meta trained its model using the Gutenberg Project (public domain) and the Books3 section of The Pile dataset.
– **Books3 Content**: Books3 includes works that may potentially be copyrighted, retrieved from the Bibliotik private tracker.
– An individual, Shawn Presser, provided a substantial dataset described as including a vast repository of possibly pirated content.

– **Ethical Concerns**:
– The text questions whether using material obtained without owner consent can constitute fair use.
– It argues that if a regular person confessed to piracy, there would be legal repercussions, which highlights a double standard in the way AI entities are treated compared to individuals.

– **Cultural and Legal Implications**:
– The author contemplates the ethical landscape of AI development reliant on potentially stolen intellectual property.
– There are concerns about the future of AI ethics versus the potential benefits AI could bring to society.

This text is relevant for professionals in both the AI and legal fields, as it raises critical issues about intellectual property rights, the compliance of AI training practices, and the broader implications of using copyrighted materials without consent. It emphasizes the need for clarity in the legal framework governing AI development and raises questions about ethical AI use and future regulations.

2 3 7 a Act AI AI development AI Ethics analysis and anti as authors AWS C CERN clarity in compliance concerns Consent content copyright copyright infringement critical D data dataset datasets de development domain Double dual e end ethical ethical AI ethical concerns Ethics fair use for framework future g Go Group hack hacker Hacker News high Highlight http HTTPS implications in Intel Intellectual Property Intellectual Property Rights IoT J k l land language language model language models large large language model large language models Large Language Models (LLMs) law lawsuit led Legal Legal Framework legal implications Legal Repercussions legality llama llm llms lm Meta model models news no o of on OPM ory out over ownership piracy point potential pre professionals Property Rights public public domain Py question R rack rate RCE red Regulation regulations repository right Ro s S3 sec SHA Sig SoC society source SSE state T templates text the to Tor TP training training data training datasets training practices trie UI up US use uth V vendor vendors Wi x