Schneier on Security: AI Mistakes Are Very Different from Human Mistakes

Jan 21, 2025

—

Source URL: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2025/01/ai-mistakes-are-very-different-from-human-mistakes.html
Source: Schneier on Security
Title: AI Mistakes Are Very Different from Human Mistakes

Feedly Summary: Humans make mistakes all the time. All of us do, every day, in tasks both new and routine. Some of our mistakes are minor and some are catastrophic. Mistakes can break trust with our friends, lose the confidence of our bosses, and sometimes be the difference between life and death.
Over the millennia, we have created security systems to deal with the sorts of mistakes humans commonly make. These days, casinos rotate their dealers regularly, because they make mistakes if they do the same task for too long. Hospital personnel write on limbs before surgery so that doctors operate on the correct body part, and they count surgical instruments to make sure none were left inside the body. From copyediting to double-entry bookkeeping to appellate courts, we humans have gotten really good at correcting human mistakes…

AI Summary and Description: Yes

Summary: The text discusses the fundamental differences between human and AI mistakes, particularly in the context of large language models (LLMs). It emphasizes the need for new security systems specifically tailored to address the unique error patterns produced by AI systems, given that their mistakes differ significantly from those of humans.

Detailed Description:
The text provides a comprehensive examination of how human mistakes and AI mistakes fundamentally differ, especially focusing on the implications for security and risk management in the usage of AI technologies, particularly LLMs. Here are the key points raised:

– **Human vs. AI Mistakes**:
– Humans are prone to errors that cluster around their knowledge limits, influenced by fatigue, distraction, and ignorance.
– AI, particularly LLMs, often generates mistakes at random times and does not exhibit ignorance about their outputs, making it difficult to predict when errors will occur.
– The consistency with which AI systems make errors poses unique challenges for trust and reliability in using these systems for complex tasks.

– **Implications of AI Mistakes**:
– The randomness and confidence with which AI systems deliver incorrect information complicate traditional error-correction systems based on human behavior.
– Existing strategies for human error correction (e.g., double-checking, peer reviews) may need adaptation for AI systems due to their inherent differences.

– **Potential Research Areas**:
– Engineering LLMs that mimic human-like mistake patterns may improve their reliability.
– Developing new systems specifically designed to catch and correct AI mistakes, taking into account their distinct nature, could enhance our ability to safely integrate AI into critical decision-making processes.

– **Research Techniques**:
– Alignment research, including reinforcement learning with human feedback, shows promise in altering LLM behavior to align more closely with human expectations.
– Specific error mitigation strategies need to be identified and tested to address unique AI mistake patterns, including the effective use of repeated questioning and synthesizing diverse responses.

– **Understanding and Managing AI Behavior**:
– Researchers are exploring the nuances of LLM cognition, including phenomena like prompt sensitivity and the availability heuristic, drawing parallels between AI and human behavior that are surprising and informative for security applications.

– **Decision-Making Limitations**:
– The text warns against placing AI in decision-making roles beyond its capabilities due to the potential severe consequences of its mistakes.

In summary, this analysis signals a critical intersection between AI, security, and operational integrity, underscoring a pressing need for a reimagined approach to risk management and compliance as AI systems become more integrated into societal frameworks. Given the unique nature of AI errors, professionals in security and compliance must develop novel mitigation strategies tailored to these intelligent systems.

1 2 5 a Act adaptation AGI AI AI behavior AI mistakes AI systems AI technologies alignment analysis and Application applications Arch art as availability based Behavior by C capabilities challenges checking CIA compliance consistency Context critical D day days de decision decision-making Decision-making Processes design e edge editing effective end engineering error correction error mitigation error patterns errors EU exp feedback for framework frameworks g Gen Go hospital http HTTPS human human error human feedback human mistakes implications in Influence information integrity Intel intelligent systems inter ite k knowledge l language language model language models large large language model large language models Large Language Models (LLMs) learning led liability life limitations llm llms lm long making making processes management mitigation mitigation strategies ML model models nation no non o oE of on one operation operational integrity Outputs over phi point pre professionals prompt Py question R randomness rate RCE real red reinforcement learning reliability research research techniques researchers response Risk risk management Role Rust s search sec security security and compliance security applications security systems sensitivity sequence side Sig Signal SoC source SSE system systems T Task tasks tech techniques technologies test text the Time to Tor TP trust US usage use V Wi x